Services / Fire Engineering / 06
Fire Safety Engineering Design & Strategy Reports
Embedded engineering input, from first sketch to sign-off.
What it is
Fire safety is decided in the details other disciplines own: the riser the services engineer needs, the open stair the architect wants, the car park ventilation nobody has claimed. We work inside design teams as the fire discipline — reviewing drawings, resolving interfaces, documenting decisions in strategy reports that keep approval, construction and handover aligned. What embedded input looks like changes with the project's stage. At concept and spatial coordination (RIBA Stages 2 and 3), it means establishing the strategy principles: escape philosophy, compartmentation approach, structural protection, the approval route — while the big moves are still cheap to change. Through technical design (Stage 4), it means reviewing drawings and specifications as the fire discipline: checking that the riser strategy, the damper schedule and the door schedule still deliver what the strategy assumed. During construction, it means answering site queries and reviewing substitutions against the approved design, so the strategy issued at handover describes the building that was actually built. Some designs cannot follow guidance clause by clause — a heritage constraint, an open-plan aspiration, a site that defeats standard fire service access. Those cases need a derogation or alternative-approach justification: a reasoned engineering case that the design achieves the required level of safety by a different route. Prepared early and agreed with building control before construction, these are routine; discovered late, they are programme risk. Much of the value of an embedded appointment is simply that the departures are identified, argued and settled while they are still design questions rather than site problems.
When you need it
- A project needs a fire engineer appointed through RIBA stages
- Design development keeps raising fire questions the team cannot close
- Building control approval needs supporting reports and derogation cases
- You want fire input early enough to be cheap rather than late and expensive
What you receive
- Stage-by-stage fire strategy reports and drawing reviews
- Derogation and alternative-approach justifications
- Responses to building control and approving-authority queries
How we do it
- Appointment and principles: we join the design team, review the brief and the emerging scheme, and establish the fire strategy principles early — the escape philosophy, the approval route, and the points where this building will need engineering rather than guidance.
- Stage-by-stage development: drawing reviews and coordination with the architect, structural and services engineers at each RIBA stage, with the strategy report updated so the documented position always matches the current design.
- Derogation and alternative-approach cases: where the design departs from Approved Document B or BS 9999, a reasoned justification is prepared and agreed with building control before it hardens into a construction problem.
- Through to sign-off and handover: responses to building control and approving-authority queries, review of construction-stage substitutions against the approved strategy, and a final strategy report that describes the completed building — ready for Regulation 38 handover.
What drives the cost
Cost is driven by the duration of the appointment and the number of RIBA stages covered, the building's size and complexity, the number of derogation or alternative-approach cases that need developing and agreeing, the volume of drawing reviews and design-team meetings the programme demands, and the approval route — higher-risk buildings under the Building Safety Act gateway regime carry heavier information requirements. We scope each commission individually and provide a fixed fee before starting.
Common questions
At what RIBA stage should a fire engineer join the design team?
Stage 2, concept design, is the point of best value — early enough to shape the escape philosophy, core positions and compartmentation approach while they are still lines on a sketch. By Stage 3 the big moves are set; a fire engineer joining at Stage 4 is largely checking decisions rather than informing them, and problems found then are resolved by redesign or by derogation cases that could have been avoided. That said, late is better than never: a workable position can usually be recovered at almost any stage — it simply costs more than it needed to.
What is a derogation?
A derogation is a documented departure from prescriptive guidance — a point where the design does not follow Approved Document B or the relevant British Standard clause by clause, justified instead by an engineering argument that the required level of safety is achieved another way. Common examples include extended travel distances, non-standard fire service access arrangements and open-plan layouts the guidance does not anticipate. A derogation is not a concession or a weakness; it is a normal instrument of fire engineering. What matters is that it is identified, reasoned in writing and agreed with the approving authority — not discovered by building control at the end.
How does this differ from a one-off fire strategy commission?
A one-off fire strategy documents the fire safety design at a point in time — appropriate for straightforward buildings where the design will not raise further questions. An embedded appointment keeps the fire discipline inside the team as the design develops: reviewing drawings, resolving the interfaces between architecture, structure and services, and updating the strategy at each stage so approval, construction and handover all work from the same current document. For complex buildings, the difference shows in the gaps — a static strategy cannot answer the questions a moving design keeps raising.
Do we need embedded fire engineering on every project?
No. A straightforward building that sits comfortably within Approved Document B needs a competent fire strategy, not a standing appointment. Embedded input earns its fee where the complexity is real: unusual geometry or occupancy, designs that will need derogation cases, higher-risk buildings passing through the Building Safety Act gateways, or programmes where fire questions keep landing between disciplines. At scoping we will say which kind of commission the project actually needs — including a smaller one, where that is the honest answer.
Related services
All servicesFurther reading
All insights